Tesla Dashcam helps clarify multi-car collision after reckless driver allegedly lies to police

A Tesla owner recently tapped into the Model 3’s built-in dashcam feature to help authorities following a high-speed, multi-car collision. With the driver who caused the accident reportedly attempting to pass off a false narrative to authorities, it was ultimately the Model 3’s dashcam footage that provided a clear, objective account of the incident.

Tesla Model 3 owner and r/TeslaMotors member u/Adwah was driving on US Route 50, a few miles before the Eastern Shore Bridge in Maryland, when a Dodge Durango sped past the electric sedan, seemingly trying to use the merge lane to pass on the right. Following this incredibly reckless maneuver, the Dodge driver unsuccessfully attempted to thread the needle, hitting two vehicles and another Model 3 in the process.

The collision was notable, and authorities eventually arrived on the scene. Before leaving the scene of the multi-car crash, the Model 3 owner informed the police that the electric sedan captured footage of the entire incident. The authorities eventually followed up with the Tesla owner, stating that the driver of the Durango was claiming that he was swerving to avoid a speeding vehicle behind him. Unfortunately, none of the other drivers involved in the collision could confirm or deny the Dodge driver’s account.

Footage from the Model 3’s built-in dashcam was then submitted to the police. With video evidence proving that the Durango driver was driving recklessly, and with footage from the Model 3’s side cameras showing no car speeding behind the SUV, authorities were able to clarify the facts of the incident. According to the Tesla owner, the police proved quite curious about the Model 3’s built-in dashcam capabilities, which arguably helped provide an objective account of the multi-car collision.

Unfortunately, the other Model 3 that was hit by the Dodge Durango was not able to capture any footage of the incident, since the vehicle’s owner had not yet set up the feature. Later updates from the r/TeslaMotors community member note that the other individuals involved in the collision did not incur any serious injuries, though some had to be taken to a medical facility due to their vehicle not deploying its airbags. A copy of the dashcam footage had also been sent to each of the drivers whose vehicles were hit by the recklessly-driving Dodge Durango.

Tesla’s built-in dashcam feature is arguably one of the most useful features that have been released by the electric car maker through a free, over-the-air update. Since its rollout, Tesla’s built-in dashcam capabilities have helped owners in numerous ways. One Model 3 owner, for example, was able to avoid a potential insurance scam after a cyclist intentionally crashed into his electric car. More recently, a Model 3 owner was able to prove to police that a truck driver was at fault after his car was damaged in an ill-conceived three-point turn.

Watch the Tesla Model 3’s footage of a speeding Dodge Durango (and the resulting multi-car collision) in the video below.

Tesla Dashcam helps clarify multi-car collision after reckless driver allegedly lies to police

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

Tesla gets full ‘Top Gear’ treatment, Chris Harris to buy Model 3 ‘soon’ after review

There was once a time when UK-based auto show Top Gear practically ignored the existence of Tesla vehicles on the car market. If the popular motoring program’s recent episode is any indication, that time appears to be long gone. The auto show’s host, Chris Harris, has become somewhat of an EV convert during his time with the all-electric sedan.

Off the bat, Harris noted that he would try his best to ignore the hype surrounding the Model 3. He stressed the importance of simply reviewing the vehicle the same way he does other cars. For the most part, he did, discussing only the vehicle’s characteristics such as its suite of fun Easter Eggs, its minimalistic interior, and its exterior looks. The Top Gear host was unimpressed with the Model 3’s design, finding the car to be far too “vanilla” for a vehicle that is being considered as an automobile that can change the face of motoring forever.

But then, the host quips, perhaps that was the point of the Model 3. Tesla made it a point to ensure that its most disruptive vehicle to date does not shock and awe at face value. Being a great car that just so happens to be electric, Harris noted that the Model 3 does appear to have what it takes to convert people away from the veterans of Europe’s hot high-performance sedan market.

And then came the track test.

Gunning the electric sedan into a track, the host could be seen genuinely enjoying the vehicle. The motiring show opted to test the Model 3 against the best high-performance sedans that Europe can offer: the Mercedez-AMG C 63 S, the BMW M3, and the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. First off was a drag race, an event that the Model 3 would likely dominate.

In order to give the vehicle a bigger challenge, the motoring show opted to hold a half-mile race. As the four-way race started, Harris was surprised when the Model 3 just kept pulling, even beyond the quarter-mile mark. The Mercedes-AMG C 63 S did catch the Model 3 a few feet away from the half-mile mark, but even with this result, the Top Gear host was convinced.

“This is the traffic light king. It’s an AK-47 disguised as a butter knife,” Harris said as he contemplated the results of the half-mile drag race.

Perhaps what really convinced Harris was the results of the Model 3’s handling test, which required the vehicle to go around a hastily-assembled course. The Top Gear host previously drove both the M3 and the Giulia Quadrifoglio on the same course, and the Alfa Romeo ended up winning against the BMW. With this in mind, Harris opted to set the time using the powerful petrol sedan. The Alfa Romeo lived up to its reputation, handling the track in a refined manner, and completing the course in 1:04:84.

The Top Gear host was not a fan of the Model 3’s handling, stating that the vehicle felt soft around the corners. It was unknown if the electric sedan’s Track Mode was activated during the test, but the Tesla nonetheless attacked the course with such ferocity that Harris was nevertheless impressed. While the Model 3 was not as refined around the corners as the Giulia Quadrifoglio, the vehicle’s insane acceleration was nonetheless enough to complete the course in 1:04:28, a full half-second faster than the Alfa Romeo. Considering that the Model 3 seemed to have only 50+% of its battery during the tests, these figures are nonetheless impressive.

The motoring show ended its Tesla segment by concluding that the Model 3 does indeed live up to Elon Musk’s statements. It does beat petrol cars, even around the track. For a show like Top Gear to admit such a thing, is not a bad accomplishment for the Model 3 at all. As for Chris Harris, he recently announced on Twitter that he has decided to buy a Tesla Model 3 for himself.

Tesla gets full ‘Top Gear’ treatment, Chris Harris to buy Model 3 ‘soon’ after review

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

Tesla Gigafactory 3’s substation rises ahead of target Model 3 production

With Gigafactory 3’s Phase 1 buildout completed, Tesla’s electric car production facility continues to evolve.  Recent drone flyovers of the expansive Shanghai site have even revealed that a substation is currently being built. Sightings of workers with ABB Robotics uniforms in the area also hint at sections of Gigafactory 3 being prepared for the installation of manufacturing robots.

Wuwa Vision (烏瓦), who has been following the progress of Gigafactory 3 since it was just an open, muddy field, was able to acquire some details about the substation being built southwest of the general assembly building. The power station reportedly costs $12 million to build, and it will be tasked to supply power to the site. Reports from the area hint at the substation being completed by September, just as the main facility becomes ready for Gigafactory 3’s initial Model 3 production.

Similar to the rapid buildout of Gigafactory 3’s general assembly building, the construction of the substation is also moving at a rapid pace. The building only started construction recently, but some parts of the substation are already taking form. Considering the speed that has been exhibited by China’s workforce so far, there seems to be little doubt that Gigafactory 3’s power station will be online sometime in September.

Interestingly, the rise of Gigafactory 3 in Shanghai’s Lingang Industrial Zone has sparked the emergence of a small community of entrepreneurs nearby. Every day, food vendors, clothing shops, and other small businesses set up shop to cater to the needs of Gigafactory 3’s workers. Jason Yang, another drone operator who has been following the buildout of the electric car factory, recently took some footage of this bustling community. Just as luck would have it, the Tesla enthusiast ended up recording footage of something interesting.

Among the workers of Gigafactory 3 that were taking a break from the day’s work, Yang was able to get a video of a worker wearing a safety vest featuring the unmistakable logo of ABB Robotics, a company that specializes in manufacturing robots. While Tesla nor its construction partner is yet to release any updates relating to ABB or its machines, the presence of an ABB worker on the site suggests that the main Gigafactory 3 facility is already getting prepared for the installation of automated manufacturing equipment.

Gigafactory 3’s rapid buildout is on track to potentially set records among China’s fastest industrial-scale construction projects. Following the completion of the Phase 1 buildout in May, the facility is expected to undergo ground hardening in June. This would be followed by pipeline communication, equipment stationing, equipment commissioning, and finally, trial electric car production runs in September.

Watch Gigafactory 3’s most recent flyovers in the videos below.

[embedded content]
[embedded content]

Tesla Gigafactory 3’s substation rises ahead of target Model 3 production

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source