Electric vehicle fire risks debunked anew in new report


Electric vehicles (EVs) have reached a point where it is almost undeniable that they will only grow in popularity in the years to come. But inasmuch as EV adoption is accelerating, some myths about electric cars and their alleged dangers simply refuse to die. 

One of these is the idea that electric cars are very prone to fires. When a fire blazed through a car park in Luton Airport last month, speculations were abounding that an electric car was to blame. Even when the Bedfordshire fire service noted that the fire seemed to have started in a diesel car, the anti-EV narrative was still prominent. 

As noted in a recent report from The Guardian, claims about electric vehicle fires tend to fall into two broad categories: one is the idea that EV fires are very common, and another alleges that when electric car fires happen, they are far more damaging. 

Fortunately, there are now millions of electric vehicles on the road today, so data about EVs is already present. And as per currently available data, evidence suggests that there is no reason to believe that electric cars are more likely to catch fire compared to their combustion-powered counterparts. In fact, the opposite seems to be true

Colin Walker, the head of transport at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, noted that combustion-powered car fires are just so common that incidents are not reported anymore. “All the data shows that EVs are just much, much less likely to set on fire than their petrol equivalent. The many, many fires that you have for petrol or diesel cars just aren’t reported,” Walker said. 

This was quite true in Norway, the country with the world’s highest proportion of electric vehicle sales. As per the directorate for social security and emergency preparedness, there are about four to five times more fires from petrol and diesel-powered cars than electric vehicles. The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency also noted that there were 3.8 fires per 100,000 electric or hybrid cars in 2022, while there were 68 fires per 100,000 cars when all fuel types are taken into account. 

Australia’s EV FireSafe’s findings were similar, with the entity finding that there was a 0.0012% chance of a passenger electric EV catching fire. For internal combustion cars, it was a 0.1% chance. Tesla, the world’s largest maker of electric vehicles has also stated that the number of fires on US roads involving its vehicles was 11 times lower per mile compared to the industry average. 

Overall, while EV fires can be very tricky when they do occur, the overall risk of being caught in one is significantly lower than for petrol or diesel cars, as per current data. Although the number of EV fires could rise as more electric cars hit the roads, their number would have to multiply several times to at least match the fire risk posed by conventional combustion-powered vehicles today.

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

Electric vehicle fire risks debunked anew in new report





Source

Tesla open sources all design and engineering of original Roadster


Tesla has open-sourced all of the design and engineering of the original Roadster, CEO Elon Musk announced today, and plenty of people are wondering if the timing of the release has anything to do with the next-gen Roadster that is now several years behind schedule.

Tesla has opened everything from Owner’s Manuals to Circuits and Connectors for the original Roadster, which was the automaker’s first project fifteen years ago in 2008.

The vehicle was essentially a fundraising campaign for Tesla as it fought to keep its doors open and transform the passenger vehicle industry. It almost bankrupted the company, but now, everything that was developed for Tesla’s initial EV project is available for anyone to take a look at.

The timing of the announcement comes toward the end of 2023, and many people are wondering if it could perhaps be a hint that Tesla’s next-gen Roadster is close to being produced.

The Roadster was supposed to be delivered for the first time in 2020, but delays and other vehicle projects have pushed the supposed production and delivery date for the 1.9-second 0-60 MPH supercar from Tesla back.

Elon Musk sets expectations for next-gen Tesla Roadster production

“We are certainly testing the patience of our reservation holders,” Musk said earlier this year. However, he also remarked that the final design and engineering of the Roadster will be completed by the end of 2023, meaning the vehicle should reach production by the end of 2024.

This is a very tentative date, though, as this is not the first time Musk has said the Roadster will be ready by a certain date. He has also said the same thing about Tesla’s Full Self-Driving suite for several years, but owners are still waiting for that to be solved.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that the Cybertruck, which is set to begin deliveries in just eight days, is expected to be a challenging project for Tesla. Musk tempered expectations for the Cybertruck during the Q3 Earnings Call in October and said it could take 18 months for Tesla to ramp production.

Additionally, the $25,000 vehicle is also in development, and we have to imagine that it would be prioritized over the Roadster for several reasons. One would be overall fiscal reasons, and the other would be the $25k vehicle will contribute to overall EV adoption significantly more than the Roadster will.

Don’t hesitate to contact us with tips! Email us at tips@teslarati.com, or you can email me directly at joey@teslarati.com.

Tesla open sources all design and engineering of original Roadster





Source

There is “reasonable evidence” Tesla and Musk knew about Autopilot defect: FL Judge


Florida Judge Reid Scott from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County has ruled that there is “reasonable evidence” that Tesla and CEO Elon Musk had been aware that its vehicles had a defective Autopilot system, but they still allowed the company’s cars to be driven in an unsafe manner anyway. 

In a ruling last week, Judge Scott noted that the plaintiff in a lawsuit over a fatal crash in 2019 could proceed to trial. With this, the plaintiff could claim damages against Tesla for alleged intentional misconduct and gross negligence. The suit was from the wife of Stephen Banner, whose Model 3 had struck an 18-wheeler truck while on Autopilot. Banner passed away due to the incident. 

As per the Florida Judge, there is evidence that Tesla “engaged in a marketing strategy that painted the products as autonomous,” as noted in a Reuters report. He also noted that Musk’s public comments about Autopilot “had a significant effect on the belief about the capabilities of the products.” Scott also stated that the suit’s plaintiff should be able to argue that Tesla’s warnings were inadequate. 

“It would be reasonable to conclude that the Defendant Tesla through its CEO and engineers was acutely aware of the problem with the ‘Autopilot’ failing to detect cross traffic,” Judge Scott wrote. 

Judge Scott also noted that a 2016 video showing what appears to be a Tesla driving without human intervention was used to market Autopilot’s capabilities. At the start of the video, Tesla noted that the person in the driver’s seat was only there for legal reasons. But as per Judge Scott, what the electric vehicle maker did not mention then was that the video was actually aspirational. 

“Absent from this video is any indication that the video is aspirational or that this technology doesn’t currently exist in the market,” Judge Scott wrote. 

A trial for the case had been set for October, but it had been delayed. A new date has not been announced. Tesla, for its part, has also not issued a response about the Judge’s findings as of yet. 

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

There is “reasonable evidence” Tesla and Musk knew about Autopilot defect: FL Judge





Source