DIYers and EVs are great bedfellows for the future of personal transportation

Welcome to a FREE preview of our weekly exclusive! Each week our team goes ‘Beyond the News’ and handcrafts a special edition that includes our thoughts on the biggest stories, why it matters, and how it could impact the future.

You can receive this newsletter along with all of our other members-exclusive newsletters, become a premium member for just $3/month. Your support goes a long way for us behind the scenes! Thank you.

I’m a big fan of Rich Benoit of Rich Rebuilds (YouTube) and Electrified Garage (his business with a mechanic friend), and it’s not just because he’s a “rebel mechanic” of sorts, always taking on unconventional challenges. Honestly, it’s because to me he represents the wave of DIY EV enthusiasm that will eventually take electric-powered personal transportation from its semi-elite status to an everyday-person commonality.

Backyard or home garage projects with various cars, classic or otherwise, has created an industry all its own with a hobby base that fuels it. While NASCAR-level performance is often out of reach financially (and practicality-wise), car enthusiasts are still inspired to invest in performance upgrades to their vehicles on a regular basis, and there’s even an entire community that spends a lot of time and money on classic car restorations. (I know I’m just rehashing the obvious here, but it’s relevant.)

These things are, of course, already starting to pop up with an electric spin via various EV conversions of other cars. EV West is one of the better known shops that pretty much does this exclusively, but it’s still a bit of an overly expensive undertaking that requires very specialized know-how. I watch videos featuring their work with about the same level of gawk as I do racing events featuring Tesla performance packages I will probably never be able to afford (or need). This is where guys like Rich come in that appeal to a very different, if more modest, crowd.

Rich’s channel is dedicated to showing you, the everyday DIYer, how EVs don’t have to remain something that only certified super mechanics and specialized shops can touch. This is particularly relevant to Tesla owners, in my opinion, and not just because Rich focuses on making Tesla mad by restoring their totaled vehicles. Sure, the company is making strides to have great service that can even come to wherever your car is, if needed. The long-long term reality though, I think, is that people will get to the point where they want to be able to have more control over the cost to maintain their cars as they age. I mean, if batteries are supposed to last a million miles soon, that means a Tesla might change ownership some five+ times before it needs a new power source. Even then, the owner might replace it with another used battery and sell it again and again, etc.

I’m not sure what Tesla’s corporate plans are for this particular kind of future, just that their leasing plans for the Tesla Network would avoid it entirely. There’s going to be a big used EV market eventually, though, and something that might really impact its viability to customers is whether or not they can work on their own vehicles. I know I worry about it vicariously, if that even makes sense.

I’ve had a mix of used and new cars over the years, but something that always worried me was having things break that I couldn’t just order online for a good price and have my local mechanic replace. Or my husband. I owned an older Mercedes very briefly once, and the first thing to go was its fancy single windshield wiper during the first storm of the year. That was a $700 fix that only a mechanic could touch! My Honda’s wipers, on the other hand, required a $70 part that had an online video to guide me through the replacement procedure.

I think these kinds of things will really matter in the long term for the average car shopper, and it takes DIYers digging into the EVs on the market to bring about that sort of availability and consumer choice. Mercedes, to reference my example again, is supposed to be a luxury vehicle that’s expensive to maintain. Tesla is trying to appeal to all consumers, as I’ve mentioned a few (dozen) times.

Here’s another angle to think about. The environmental point of all this EV stuff should be a big factor in the used market as well. Consumer trade-ins and trade-ups are pretty common, and a leasing-focused future encourages this. But if the carbon footprint of making a new vehicle is compared with that of restoring or maintaining an older one, I assume keeping older cars in good condition would be the environmental preference, no? Anyhow, I’m glad guys like Rich are around, pointing to one of the directions the industry needs to go.

DIYers and EVs are great bedfellows for the future of personal transportation

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

Tesla’s new software will display traffic cones in improved Driving Visualizations

Tesla has started to roll out Software Update 2019.36.1, showing improvements to the Driving Visualization feature. Tesla Model 3 owners are noticing cones being displayed on the vehicle’s center touchscreen, thereby creating a more detailed view of objects on the road and adding an extra sense of awareness of a driver’s surroundings.

Kelvin Yang shared an image of his Tesla Model 3’s dash displaying the rendering of traffic cones. This is the most recent object the software is able to recognize, an addition CEO Elon Musk said would be available “soon” just two weeks ago. The announcement came in response to an Autopilot video shared from a Tesla owner, showing the vehicle navigating safely away from cones on the highway, but Musk stated the Visualization feature would be able to render the small, bright orange obstacles in the near future. Even though most traffic cones are fitted with reflective tape to increase visibility, there are instances where this is not the case, and colliding with a cone at a high rate of speed could cause excess body damage.

Driving Visualization renders a vehicle’s surroundings, giving a live and detailed look of what is around the car at all times. The software shows a very descriptive and realistic illustration of everything near the car, and improvements to Driving Visualization have been frequent since its release in May 2019. Tesla has added features like recognition of vehicle type, where it will accurately depict the size and shape of the vehicle on your screen, and a rotate and zoom feature that helps eliminate blind spots. In Tesla’s V10 release notes, the company stated Zoom and Rotate would help drivers “enjoy an improved 360 view around your car — a more dynamic interface recognizes and displays a wider variety of objects and lane lines. Since driving visualization is on the touchscreen in Model 3, you can also drag and pinch the display to temporarily adjust view angle and zoom. After a short period of inactivity, the visualization will return to the default position.” The ability to zoom and rotate would be ideal for navigating through busy parking lots for owners who do not have Full Self-Driving’s Smart Summon feature.

Recently, Tesla added more improvements when the software gained the ability to render semi-trucks and buses, a detail that could assist drivers during the nighttime hours when vision is limited due to darkness. The constant addition of various surroundings will help drivers avoid collisions with objects on the road, and will add additional driving confidence. The improvement of Tesla’s vehicles through regular software updates continues to make driving a safer activity for owners and pedestrians alike.

Tesla’s new software will display traffic cones in improved Driving Visualizations

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

Top Gear doubles down on Tesla vs Porsche race, claims Model S’ actual results are worse

Top Gear‘s saga involving a drag race between the Tesla Model S Performance and the Porsche Taycan Turbo S continues to unravel, as CEO Elon Musk expressed his comments on Twitter and the motoring publication posted an update defending its results. 

Following the release of a thorough analysis of the Model S vs Porsche Taycan drag race which suggested that Top Gear did not engage the Tesla’s Launch Mode and full Ludicrous Plus capabilities in the race, CEO Elon Musk took to Twitter to offer his take on the two vehicles’ bout. According to Musk, Top Gear did miss the Model S’ real performance figures, especially since the numbers published by the motoring publication were inconsistent with what regular Tesla owners have recorded on their vehicles. 

Amidst criticism from the electric car community, Top Gear has issued a response explaining its Model S Performance vs Taycan Turbo S drag race results. Quite surprisingly, the motoring publication admitted that they did use Model S figures from a previous race in the Tesla vs Porsche drag battle. Even more surprisingly, Top Gear claimed that this was done in favor of the Tesla Model S Performance. 

Explaining its results, Top Gear stated that the best figures recorded for the Tesla Model S Performance during its battle with the Taycan were a 0-60 mph time of 2.83 seconds, a 0-100 mph time of 6.64 seconds, and a quarter-mile time of 11.23 seconds at 123.2 mph. These figures were worse than the 0-60 mph time of 2.68 seconds, 0-100 mph time of 6.46 seconds, and quarter-mile time of 11.08 seconds at 124.0 mph listed by the publication in its comparative video. 

“These were numbers we recorded in a Model S on a previous occasion. We ran them because these are the best figures we’ve achieved in a Model S to date so we know that’s what the car is capable of. And just to be clear, the Tesla was in Ludicrous+ mode, the battery was pre-conditioned and both cars had around 85 per cent charge before the first run,” Top Gear wrote

Looking at Top Gear‘s statement and clarification, it appears that the motoring publication is suggesting that the Raven Model S Performance actually has worse capbilities than a vehicle that it used from back in 2017. This does not align with the experiences of Tesla owners at all, many of whom have reported that the Raven Model S Performance can actually outrun a Tesla Model S P100D in the quarter-mile. 

Interestingly, Top Gear‘s clarification did not address the main concern expressed by the Tesla community about the Model S vs Taycan race — that the Tesla was not in Launch Mode during its drag battle with the German-made all-electric sports car. This, apart from the fact that a video of the Model S’ interior while it was racing with the Taycan showed that the vehicle’s Range Mode was activated, further clouds Top Gear‘s defense of its race. 

Overall, it is quite disappointing to see Top Gear standing by its Tesla Model S Performance vs Porsche Taycan Turbo S drag race results. With the race practically debunked, it would not be in the Porsche Taycan’s best interests to run away with a win from the Model S at this point. The Taycan deserves a clean win, and it is something that it can actually achieve, considering its dual-speed gearbox. Simply put, it would be better for Top Gear at this point to race the two vehicles again, this time with both cars on Launch Control, and this time with an actual Raven Model S, to provide an accurate depiction of a drag race between these two excellent vehicles.

Top Gear doubles down on Tesla vs Porsche race, claims Model S’ actual results are worse

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source