Tesla (TSLA) short responds to Elon Musk’s invite with odd demands and side remarks

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) short and hedge fund manager David Einhorn has issued a response to Elon Musk’s invitation to meet and visit the electric car maker’s facilities. Einhorn agreed to meet with Musk in his response, though he had a number of odd demands and remarks that went along with his acceptance. 

Similar to Musk’s letter, Einhorn’s response was long and posted on Twitter via a screenshot. In it, the Greenlight Capital President challenged the Tesla CEO, claiming that while both his hedge fund and Tesla “struggled” last year, his business has generated “real profits for investors” since it was established in 1996. He also denied that his TSLA short has performed badly as well, arguing that it has merely “fluctuated.” 

Following is Einhorn’s letter to Musk in full. 

Dear Elon, 

I am glad that you read our October letter and would like to discuss it. You say we “made numerous false allegations against Tesla.” 

Could you be more specific? Can you point to at least one sentence that is false and refute it with facts? We certainly are capable of making mistakes and if we said anything false, we will correct it for the record. Facts do matter to us. I can’t imagine how it would feel to have entire websites like https://elonmusk.today chronicling your untruths.

Our business have some similarities and differences. We both struggled last year. However, a key difference is that Greenlight’s business has generated real profits for our investors since we began in 1996. Tesla’s business financials reflect a decade of annual losses and an accumulated deficit of $6 billion, despite billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies. 

As for our short of Tesla, it’s fluctuated. In a multi-year bull market, it hasn’t performed badly. By continually changing the narrative and narrowly averting crisis after crisis, you have certainly kept it interesting. We shall see what happens from here. 

We welcome your offer to let us learn more about Tesla and will take you up on it. This is a stark contrast from Tesla’s prior position, as your IR team has refused several requests from us to converse directly and answer our questions. 

I think facility visits would be fun (can we start in Buffalo?). I might learn the difference between your alien dreadnought factory and cars made by hand in a tent. 

The truth is we are much more interested in, and have many questions about, your financial statements.  Perhaps, we could spend some time together with your CFO, Zach Kirkhorn. 

As an example, my understanding of auto sales is that car buyers don’t typically drive off the lot without paying for the car. Publicly-traded auto dealers have only a couple days of account receivable balances. Yet, Tesla is owed over $1 billion by its customers. With customers paying up front, why are the balances so high? In September 2018, you said the receivables doubled up because the quarter ended on a Sunday. That answer wasn’t very satisfying at the time. This year, the quarter ended on a weekday. Sales are lower than they were a year ago and yet, the receivables were high. We are curious. 

We have dozens of questions like that. 

I truly appreciate your offer to build a direct communication so we can learn more about Tesla. Please advise on how we should go about scheduling. And have a nice weekend. 

David Einhorn

Looking at Einhorn’s response, it appears that the TSLA short is not really taking an open-minded approach in responding to Musk’s letter. Instead, Einhorn seems to be doubling down on his allegations of fraud against Musk with his suggestion that the electric car maker’s finances don’t line up. With such a response, including snide, outdated references to GA4, it would not be very surprising if Tesla does not choose to go forward with Elon Musk’s initial invitation.  

This is quite ironic considering that Einhorn himself and his fund, Greenlight Capital, were fined by the UK Financial Service Authority (FSA) for £7.2 million (US$9.27 million) for insider trading. According to the FSA, Einhorn engaged in “market abuse” in relation to a fundraising by pub group Punch Taverns in June 2009. Greenlight has also struggled over the past year, being unable to beat the market and declining 34% last year, its worst year since the fund was founded.

Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of TSLA and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.

Tesla (TSLA) short responds to Elon Musk’s invite with odd demands and side remarks

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

Tesla Model 3 soundly humbles tuned 2020 Toyota Supra in drag race

It is pretty interesting to note that the Tesla Model 3 Performance is actually the electric car maker’s most conservative Performance-branded vehicle in its lineup. Without a special launch feature like Ludicrous Mode, the Model 3 Performance relies on its raw power in straight-line races. Yet, despite this, the Model 3 is still a force in the drag strip, even when it is against a car like the 2020 Toyota Supra. 

The 2020 Toyota Supra follows a long line of high-performance vehicles from Japan that have established their mark on the quarter-mile. Thanks to their capability to be tuned to their absolute limits, classic Supras can become monsters and supercar killers on their own right, and some still dominate on the drag strip until today. That being said, the 2020 Supra is a different animal compared to its predecessor, as the vehicle was developed in partnership with German carmaker BMW. 

The 2020 Toyota Supra that ran against the Model 3 Performance was not a stock car. As noted by Brooks of YouTube’s DragTimes, the owner of the Supra makes it a point to always improve his vehicles. Thus, the sports car is equipped with downpipes and tune, allowing the 3.0-liter 6-Cylinder, RWD, 8-Speed automatic Supra to have 430 Whp (500 hp crank). The vehicle is also equipped with drag radials and custom wheels, making it a step above a stock 2020 Supra. 

On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 Performance is all stock. The all-electric sedan has dual motors that give the family sedan a combined 473 hp. The vehicle also has an ample 85% charge in its battery. 

The two vehicles ran two races, and as noted by the DragTimes host, his reaction times during the bouts were not his best. Thus, for the races, the Model 3 Performance would have to catch up to the Toyota Supra before it could win the race. Fortunately for Brooks, his Model 3 was up to the task. Despite launching later than the Supra, the Tesla Model 3 Performance promptly caught up during the first run, overtaking the Toyota sports car and ending the race at 11.765 seconds at 112.72 mph. The Supra had a higher trap speed of 114.47, but it took the vehicle 12.102 seconds to finish the quarter-mile. 

The second race ended with the same results, with the Model 3 Performance hitting the quarter-mile mark at 11.787 seconds at 112.38 mph, while the 2020 Toyota Supra completed the run in 12.071 seconds at 114.72 mph.  

Watch the drag race between the Tesla Model 3 Performance and the 2020 Toyota Supra in the video below. 

[embedded content]

Tesla Model 3 soundly humbles tuned 2020 Toyota Supra in drag race

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source

How much is EV manufacturer branding going to matter in the long term?

Welcome to a FREE preview of our weekly exclusive! Each week our team goes ‘Beyond the News’ and handcrafts a special edition that includes our thoughts on the biggest stories, why it matters, and how it could impact the future.

You can receive this newsletter along with all of our other members-exclusive newsletters, become a premium member for just $3/month. Your support goes a long way for us behind the scenes! Thank you.

German publication Das Spiegel came out with a very good analysis on the car industry in the country and how new technology is changing its landscape significantly. Yes, it went over how far behind the former auto industry leader is now in terms of electric vehicles, but what I found even more interesting were the details hashed out about self-driving technology.

German auto makers are woefully behind in the tech, especially compared to companies like Waymo; however, most of those companies are looking to license their products rather than compete with car companies directly (unlike Tesla’s Master of the Universe approach). We’ve heard about the promises that autonomous taxi networks will live up to, so now I’ve started to wonder.

How much is manufacturer branding going to matter in the long term? Will the auto industry head towards a future similar to the airline industry? As Das Spiegel puts it, “At the end of the day, people don’t fly with a brand like Airbus or Boeing, they do so with an airline like Lufthansa or Emirates.”

Additionally, is it going to matter how well everyone (i.e., legacy auto) keeps up with EV makers when transportation overall is going to change so significantly that the old sales models will no longer apply?

Citing Waymo CEO John Krafcik’s perspective on Autopilot-type programs as a prompt, the article explains, “…companies could be making money not only from the sale of vehicles but also from every single mile the customer travels… That will be even truer once human drivers, the greatest cost factor in an autonomous vehicle, are completely eliminated. Taxis without drivers, maintenance trips without staff, deliveries without deliverers — in this new world, there will be no salaries or benefits to pay and the machines only go on strike when they have technical problems.” What happens when humans neither impact the manufacturing and service decisions and play a much smaller role in the purchasing decisions?

It seems like German automakers have been very slow to come around to the EV future due, in part, to a nostalgia for what the driving experience used to be and still is for those who still pay premium prices for such ‘driving machines.’ If the future of car ownership is going to be handed over to merely what’s most efficient for place-to-place travel, though, what does that mean for this industry’s experience factor when the engine is eliminated for electric motors and passengers aren’t even paying attention to the feeling of their wheels on the road, the turning radius, the pedal response, etc.?

Sure, some of these things will matter. Using the airline metaphor, customers have serious opinions about the kind of plane they travel in. Small seats and shaky cabins get terrible reviews, but when you need a ticket to your family reunion and price is the biggest factor in your decision, how much input does a customer really have when it comes to the vehicle being used to transport them? Car companies today are appealing to consumers as individuals, but when the consumers start becoming just one number in a larger “base” of people hailing a ride, or perhaps individual business owners looking for the most cost-efficient vehicle to generate money while they’re not using it, what does that mean for the whole “driving experience” model?

Will companies like BMW and Porsche switch over to a pooling type approach, appealing to taxi companies and the like instead of the mom or dad that has kids? Will they purchase all of their parts for various suppliers and just concentrate on body design and tech offerings? Are subscription services similar to cellular companies? On ride-hailing apps, customers choose the size or general style of the car they want to take, but that’s obviously a starkly different decision process than seeing ads, browsing at dealerships, taking test rides, etc.

Tesla will probably be an initial bellwether for how customers will respond to the transition, but I do wonder how much the airline metaphor will play out. WiFi, drink selections, destination discounts, travel package offers, etc., combined with other in-car luxuries like individual temperature controls and so forth will come along I’m sure. But, still.

What happens to, “Because we promised you a Mercedes Benz, that’s why…,”?

How much is EV manufacturer branding going to matter in the long term?

<!–

View Comments

–>

Source