[embedded content]

This year’s Ultimate Dubs was one of the best yet! Want proof? Just take a look at this great video from our friends over at Air Lift.

And once you’re done, head on over to our Ultimate Dubs photos.


2020 Ford Explorer fights punctures with self-sealing tires

The 2020 Ford Explorer will do its darnedest to make sure a tire puncture won’t immediately put a driver on the side of the road with self-sealing tires from Michelin.

Michelin’s self-sealing tires aren’t new—they were developed for the Chevrolet Bolt EV—but the 2020 Explorer marks the first time an SUV will wear them as standard equipment on select trims, Ford announced on Tuesday. Specifically, the Platinum and Limited Hybrid four-wheel-drive models will get the self-sealing tires as standard. They’ll be optional on non-hybrid Explorer Limited models. Every Explorer will also come with a spare tire and use a 255/55R20 tire size.

2020 Ford Explorer, 2019 Detroit auto show

2020 Ford Explorer, 2019 Detroit auto show

How do the trick tires work? If the driver runs over a nail, for example, the tires are lined with an eco-friendly rubber sealant to plug the puncture and keep air from escaping quickly. Internal Michelin data showed the tires stopped 90 percent of punctures that measured up to a quarter-inch in diameter. These kinds of punctures only showed a loss of 15 psi over one week after the puncture. So, yes, the driver will still need to replace or repair the tire, but at least it won’t leave him or her stranded within 10 minutes of the incident’s occurrence.

If the object, like a screw, stays in the tire, the sealant surrounds the screw to keep air from escaping. If the screw falls out, the sealant fills the tire tread to fill the hole up to a quarter of an inch. The safety net ensures the Explorer is still safe to drive for the time being. Any low tire-pressure warnings should be addressed sooner rather than later. Like other tires, the self-sealing tires can’t fix punctures in the sidewalls.

The self-sealing tires will have to do until tire manufacturers realize their dreams of producing airless tires that will make punctures and flats memories of the past.


Tesla excluded from NY charger incentive program, argues discrimination

Tesla alleges that it’s being discriminated against by the New York state government’s electric vehicle charging cash incentive program. In their march to encourage the transition to clean energy transportation in the consumer market, the state’s Department of Public Service has issued an Order which provides monetary supplements to companies installing publicly accessible EV charging stations. However, the money is only available if both a Combined Charging System (CCS) plug and a CHAdeMo plug are included, not the proprietary charger used by Tesla vehicles. Per the Order:

“Tesla uses its own standard…which the Commission does not recognize as publicly accessible for purposes of this incentive program…Tesla DCFC [direct-current fast charging] stations will become eligible for this per-plug incentive where their proprietary technology is coupled with plug types that enables use by EVs with Asian and European charging systems.”

Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo entered into a “Memorandum of Understanding” with other like-minded governors to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions in October 2013. Specifically, the plan aims to reduce emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Part of that initiative includes creating incentives for EV purchases via “Zero-Emission Vehicle” (ZEV) programs to quantify to 800,000 to 1 million ZEVs on state roads by 2025.

Tesla and other EV manufacturers participated in a hearing prior to the Order which resulted in a Consensus Proposal wherein the government and the companies agreed to the conditions of the program. In that Consensus, however, “publicly accessible” was defined as stations available without physical limitations (i.e., exclusive locations) or membership requirements for use. The later-issued Order implementing the program redefined the term “publicly accessible” to include specific types of technology, ultimately excluding Tesla’s proprietary chargers.

Tesla objects to this and has since filed a Petition for Rehearing arguing against the state’s overreach. Per the Petition:

“…without providing any notice of intent to adopt an alternative definition to that set forth in the Consensus Proposal, and without any reasonable record support or rational basis…the Order’s novel definition of ‘publicly accessible’ is unlawful and arbitrary and capricious since it is devoid of record support, lacking a rational basis, and discriminatory.”

The cash incentive program is set to last seven years (2019-2025) and not to exceed 1,074 total stations and/or $28 million dollars provided to participants. To qualify, stations must have charging capability of at least 50 kW, a higher cash incentive being offered for rates over 75 kW. The cash incentive amounts range by regional provider and, according to the Order establishing the charger program, the variance is between $4,000 and $17,000 for the 75 kW stations. With each passing year, the cash incentive amount declines significantly, thus rewarding early birds.

Despite Tesla being the top-selling EV in the country, New York is using its money to vote in favor of a public charging standard, leaving proprietary versions at a disadvantage. Perhaps this wouldn’t seem unusual if Tesla wasn’t arguably the (market-driven) reason New York can dream of such an EV-centered future.

New York has a lot to gain as Tesla continues to bring parity to efficient fueling of electric cars with conventional gas-powered vehicles, especially with the release of its newest 1,000 mi/hr Supercharger V3.

Tesla excluded from NY charger incentive program, argues discrimination


View Comments